PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Judiciary and Education.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 28, 1993
Commission on Closure and Relocation of the Lorton Correctional Complex Act - Establishes the Commission on Closure and Relocation of the Lorton Correctional Complex to: (1) develop comprehensive plans for closing the Complex by the year 2010, including options for the use of the land on which the complex is located, and establishing new model prison facilities within the District of Columbia to replace the Complex; and (2) identify and recommend appropriate strategies for improving the effectiveness and safety of the Complex's operations until it is closed and the new facilities are established. Authorizes appropriations.
People & committees
Rep. Wolf, Frank R. [R-VA-10] · R–VA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Judiciary and Education.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration.
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Referred to the House Committee on District of Columbia.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2715-2716)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3416 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3416 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3416 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3416 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.