To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to provide for a sequestration of all budgetary accounts for fiscal year 1997 (except Social Security, Federal retirement, and interest on the debt) equal to 5 percent of the OMB baseline.

Referred to the House Committee on the Budget.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 8, 1996

Amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to require: (1) a sequestration of five percent of the OMB (Office of Management and Budget) baseline for that fiscal year; and (2) the President to immediately fully implement the sequestration. Exempts benefits under title II (Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance) of the Social Security Act, retirement benefits for members of the uniformed services or U.S. officers or employees, and payments for net interest.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Campbell, Tom [R-CA-15] · R–CA

Committees

Budget Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

May 8, 1996
Referred to the House Committee on the Budget.
May 8, 1996
Introduced in House
May 8, 1996
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · May 8, 1996 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3414 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3414, 104th Congress: To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to provide for a sequestration of all budgetary accounts for fiscal year 1997 (except Social Security, Federal retirement, and interest on the debt) equal to 5 percent of the OMB baseline.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3414

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-05-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3414/BILLS-104hr3414ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T19:32:04Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.3414 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3414 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3414, 104th Congress: To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to provide for a sequestration of all budgetary accounts for fiscal year 1997 (except Social Security, Federal retirement, and interest on the debt) equal to 5 percent of the OMB baseline.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3414

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-05-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3414/BILLS-104hr3414ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T19:32:04Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3414 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3414 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3414, 104th Congress: To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to provide for a sequestration of all budgetary accounts for fiscal year 1997 (except Social Security, Federal retirement, and interest on the debt) equal to 5 percent of the OMB baseline.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3414

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-05-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3414/BILLS-104hr3414ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T19:32:04Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3414 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3414 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3414, 104th Congress: To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to provide for a sequestration of all budgetary accounts for fiscal year 1997 (except Social Security, Federal retirement, and interest on the debt) equal to 5 percent of the OMB baseline.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3414

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-05-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3414/BILLS-104hr3414ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T19:32:04Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3414 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.