PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 107-353.
Congressional Research Service
Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Jul 15, 2002
California Five Mile Regional Learning Center Transfer Act - Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to: (1) convey to the Clovis Unified School District of California a specified parcel of National Forest System (NFS) land which has been utilized as the Five Mile Regional Learning Center by such school district since 1989 pursuant to a special use permit to provide natural resource conservation education to California youth; and (2) negotiate with the school district to enter into a new permit for the approximately 100 acres of NFS land that the school district is using pursuant to the present permit but that is not included in such conveyance.States that the conveyance shall be for a nominal cost and shall not include the transfer of mineral rights.
People & committees
Rep. Radanovich, George [R-CA-19] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-353.
Became Public Law No: 107-353.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR 11/19/2002 S11652-11655)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR 11/19/2002 S11652-11655)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 678.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Bingaman without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Bingaman without amendment. Without written report.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5000)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5000)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3401.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5000-5001)
Mrs. Cubin moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 344.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-574.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-574.
Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health Discharged.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Executive Comment Requested from USDA.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2194-2195)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3401 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3401 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3401 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3401 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.