PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 106-360.
Congressional Research Service
Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Oct 5, 2000
Directs the Secretary of the Interior to make technical corrections on a Coastal Barriers Resources System map relating to North Captiva Island, Lee County, Florida, as necessary to bring such map in conformity with the map entitled "Amendments to the Coastal Barrier Resources System."
People & committees
Rep. Goss, Porter J. [R-FL-14] · R–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 106-360.
Became Public Law No: 106-360.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by recorded vote (2/3 required): 407 - 1 (Roll no. 530). (consideration: CR H9842)
House roll call 530 · Individual votesResolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by recorded vote (2/3 required): 407 - 1 (Roll no. 530).(consideration: CR H9842)
House roll call 530 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10010-10011; text: CR S10010-10011)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10010-10011; text: CR S10010-10011)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 920.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Smith, of NH with amendments. With written report No. 106-471.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Smith, of NH with amendments. With written report No. 106-471.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Committee consideration and Mark Up Session held.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR 11/19/1999 H12844)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR 11/19/1999 H12844)
Mr. Saxton asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H12844)
Committee on Resources discharged.
Committee on Resources discharged.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.34 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.34 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.34 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.34 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.