PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3399 / 103rd Congress

Disaster Response and Recovery Act of 1993

Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 28, 1993

Disaster Response and Recovery Act of 1993 - Amends The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Disaster Act) and other specified Federal law to establish a new framework for governing the Federal Government's and State and local governments' preparedness for, response to, and recovery from, major disasters, emergencies, and terrorist attacks and coordination among such entities (including private relief agencies) in responding to such events through a reorganization of operations of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (Sec.) Defines "catastrophic disaster." (Sec. 4) Transfers to the FEMA Director certain authority granted to the President under the Disaster Act, such as the authority to make grants to States for disaster preparedness, hazard mitigation, and assistance for individuals and families adversely affected by a major disaster. Imposes new duties on FEMA under the Disaster Act, such as: (1) developing plans for providing Federal assistance, when requested, to affected States and establishing chains of command, Federal agency duties, and the relationship between them and those of the State and local governments and private relief agencies involved; (2) establishing respective systems for utilizing volunteers and managing donated goods in disasters and emergencies as well as disaster suport teams for use in areas where a major disaster or emergency is likely to be declared or has been declared; (3) issuing performance standards for ensuring State preparedness for major disasters and emergencies; (4) reviewing such State preparedness annually as well as the role of fire services in responding to such events; (5) inventorying resources available regionally to the Federal Government for post-disaster and -emergency use; and (6) ensuring that such regional inventories are made available to the Governor of each State in the region. Authorizes appropriations. (Sec. 4) Requires the Secretary of Defense to direct the Chief of the National Guard Bureau to review the role of the National Guard in responding to major disasters and emergencies and develop an interstate compact for the mutual use of National Guard assets across State borders during major disasters and emergencies. (Sec. 8) Repeals the limitation on the use of sliding scales. (Sec. 14) Requires that the Director of FEMA have appropriate experience in order to be appointed. Redesignates FEMA Regional Director positions as career reserved positions. Requires various specified positions to be subject to presidential appointment without Senate confirmation. (Sec. 15) Revises the Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950 to abolish the Federal Civil Defense Adminstration and vest in FEMA the Federal Government's responsibility for the civil defense of the United States (which includes Federal disaster preparedness, response, and recovery activities with respect to major and catastrophic disasters and emergencies). Grants FEMA the authority to delegate civil defense responsibilities to the the appropriate Federal departments and agencies, and review and coordinate the civil defense activities of such entities with each other and with the activities of the States and neighboring countries.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Borski, Robert A. [D-PA-3] · D–PA

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Armed Services Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

  2. Executive Comment Requested from DOD.

  3. Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

  4. Referred to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.

  5. Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

  6. Introduced in House

  7. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3399 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3399 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3399 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3399 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources