PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3378 / 104th Congress

Indian Health Care Improvement Technical Corrections Act of 1996

Became Public Law No: 104-313.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 1, 1996

Amends the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to extend the demonstration program for direct billing of Medicare, Medicaid, and other third party payors.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Young, Don [R-AK-At Large] · R–AK

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 104-313.

  2. Became Public Law No: 104-313.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Senate agreed to the House amendment to the Senate amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S12402)

  9. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendment to the Senate amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S12402)

  10. Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate amendment.

  11. House agreed to Senate amendment with an amendment pursuant to H. Res. 544. (consideration: CR H11416-11418)

  12. Resolving differences -- House actions: House agreed to Senate amendment with an amendment pursuant to H. Res. 544.(consideration: CR H11416-11418)

  13. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  14. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  15. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  16. Amendment SP 5392 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

  17. Amendment SP 5392 proposed by Senator Stevens for Senator McCain.

  18. Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S11051-11053)

  19. Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 577.

  20. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  21. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

  22. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

  23. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  24. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9970-9971)

  25. Mr. Doolittle moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  26. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 390.

  27. Committee on Commerce discharged.

  28. Committee on Commerce discharged.

  29. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-742, Part I.

  30. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-742, Part I.

  31. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  32. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  33. Subcommittee on Native American and Insular Affairs Discharged.

  34. Referred to the Subcommittee on Native American and Insular Affairs.

  35. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and Environment, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Chairman.

  36. Referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  37. Referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  38. Referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  39. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E694-695)

  40. Introduced in House

  41. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jun 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3378 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3378 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3378 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3378 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources