Federal Workforce Restructuring Act of 1994 - Authorizes temporary "buy-out" programs for encouraging selected groups of employees in the executive and judicial branches (except employees of the Department of Defense or the Central Intelligence Agency) to separate from Government service, generally by January 1, 1995, by offering them lump-sum payments in order to avoid or minimize reductions in force (RIFs). Requires: (1) such payments (the lesser of $25,000 or the amount of the employee's severance pay) to be paid from amounts available for the employee's pay, and to be fully repaid if the employee rejoins the Federal Government within five years of separation; (2) the elimination of one position for each one vacated by reason of a separation payment; (3) the funds appropriated for such positions to be used only for authorized separation costs; and (4) participating Federal agencies to pay a specified contribution to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund based on the final rate of basic pay of each employee who retires early. Sets annual limitations on the total number of full-time equivalent executive agency positions each fiscal year through FY 1999, subject to waiver under certain conditions, such as war or a life-threatening emergency. Prohibits further agency hiring in cases of noncompliance with such limitations, except with respect to those positions that the President determines are critical to the agency's mission or efficiency, in which case the overall limitations established above still apply.
Second cloture motion on the Conference report to accompany H.R. 3345 invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 63-36. Record Vote No: 76. (consideration: CR S3618)
Second cloture motion on the Conference report accompanying H.R. 3345 presented in Senate. (consideration: CR S3536)
Cloture motion on the Conference report accompanying H.R. 3345 presented in Senate. (consideration: CR S3536)
Conference report considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S3615-3619)
Motion to proceed to the consideration of the Conference report agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 62-29. Record Vote No: 71. (consideration: CR S3536)
Mr. Castle moved to recommit the bill to the committee of conference, with instructions to the managers on the part of the House, to agree to the provisions committed to conference in the Senate amendment No. 1, to the House amendment to the Senate amendment (the Gramm amendment creating the Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund and providing a conforming reduction in the discretionary spending limits).
Mr. Castle moved to recommit with instructions to the conference committee.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 388, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.
Mr. Clay brought up conference report H. Rept. 103-435 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 388.
Rule H. Res. 388 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 388 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 3345.
Conference report H. Rept. 103-435 filed. (text of conference report: CR H1372-1373)
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 103-435 filed.(text of conference report: CR H1372-1373)
Conference papers: Senate report and managers' statement held at the desk in Senate.
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on Rules for consideration of Senate amendment No. 1 and modifications committed to conference: Derrick, Beilenson, and Solomon.
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on Government Operations for consideration of Senate amendment No. 1 and modifications committed to conference: Conyers, Towns, and Clinger.
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on the Judiciary for consideration of Senate amendment No. 1 and modifications committeed to conference: Brooks, Schumer, and Sensenbrenner.
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service for consideration of the Senate amendments to the House amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Clay, McCloskey, Norton, Myers, and Morella.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by recorded vote: 231 - 150 (Roll No. 57). (consideration: CR H1302)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Castle motion to instruct conferees. The instructions contained in the motion require the managers on the part of the House to agree to the amendment of the Senate numbered 1, the Gramm amendment creating the Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund and providing a conforming reduction in the discretionary spending limits.
Mr. Castle moved that the House instruct conferees.
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendments to the House amendment to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H1301-1302)
Mr. Clay moved that the House disagree to the Senate amendments to the House amendment to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.
Senate insists on its amendments asks for a conference, appoints conferees Glenn; Pryor; Sasser; Roth; Stevens.
Senate concurred in the House amendment to the Senate amendment with amendments (SP1495) by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2831-2841)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate concurred in the House amendment to the Senate amendment with amendments (SP1495) by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S2831-2841)
Amendment SP 1495 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 90-2. Record Vote No: 56.
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3345.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 357, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Penny amendment.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.
The Speaker designated the Honorable James P. Moran to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 357 and Rule XXIII.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3345 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit. Providing for the consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against consideration of the bill shall be waived. Specified amendments are in order. It shall be in order to consider the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part 1 of the report accompanying this resolution, and the amendment shall be considered as read. No amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except the amendment printed in part 2 of the report accompanying this resolution, to be offered in the manner specified. Said amendment shall not be subject to further amendment or a demand for division. All points of order against the amendments shall be waived.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 357. (consideration: CR H445-455)
Rule H. Res. 357 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 357 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3345 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit. Providing for the consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against consideration of the bill shall be waived. Specified amendments are in order. It shall be in order to consider the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part 1 of the report accompanying this resolution, and the amendment shall be considered as read. No amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except the amendment printed in part 2 of the report accompanying this resolution, to be offered in the manner specified. Said amendment shall not be subject to further amendment or a demand for division. All points of order against the amendments shall be waived.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 211.
Reported by the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. H. Rept. 103-386.
Reported by the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. H. Rept. 103-386.
Ordered to be Reported.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Compensation and Employee Benefits.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil Service.
Referred to the House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Feb 6, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3345 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3345 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3345 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3345 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.