PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 107-117.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 19, 2001
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2002 - Appropriates funds for FY 2002 for the Department of Defense (DOD) for: (1) military personnel; (2) operation and maintenance (including for the Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund, the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and environmental restoration); (3) procurement(including for shipbuilding and conversion); (4) research, development, test, and evaluation; (5) revolving and management funds; (6) the Defense Health Program; (7) chemical agents and munitions destruction; (8) drug interdiction and counter-drug activities; (9) the Office of the Inspector General; (10) the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund; (11) the Intelligence Community Management Account; (12) payment to the Kaho'olawe Island Conveyance, Remediation, and Environmental Restoration Fund; (13) the National Security Education Trust Fund; (14) the Counter-Terrorism and Operational Response Transfer Fund to prosecute Operation Enduring Freedom; (15) former Soviet Union threat reduction; (16) the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization;(17) DOD chemical and biological weapon defense programs; and (18) the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.Emergency Supplemental Act, 2002 - Appropriates funds for FY 2002 for emergency expenses to respond to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States for: (1) the Departments of Agriculture, Health and Human Services, Justice, Commerce, State and related agencies, Defense, the Interior, Energy, Labor, Education and related agencies, Transportation and related agencies, the Treasury, Veterans Affairs, and Housing and Urban Development; (2) the Judiciary; (3) the District of Columbia; (4) the Smithsonian Institution; (5) the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts; (6) the National Capital Planning Commission; (7) the Legislative Branch; (8) the Commodity Futures Trading Commission; (9) the General Services Administration; (10) the Environmental Protection Agency: (11) the Federal Emergency Management Agency; (12) the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; and (13) the National Science Foundation.
People & committees
Rep. Lewis, Jerry [R-CA-40] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-117.
Became Public Law No: 107-117.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 94 - 2. Record Vote Number: 380.
Senate roll call 380 · Individual votesConference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 94 - 2. Record Vote Number: 380.
Senate roll call 380 · Individual votesConference report considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S13832-13856, S13864-13865, S13869-13871)
On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 408 - 6 (Roll no. 510).
House roll call 510 · Individual votesMotions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 408 - 6 (Roll no. 510).
House roll call 510 · Individual votesConference papers: Senate report and manager's statement and message on House action held at the desk in Senate.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.
Mr. Lewis (CA) brought up conference report H. Rept. 107-350 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 324. (consideration: CR H10917-10934)
Rule H. Res. 324 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 324 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 3338. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read when called up for consideration.
Conference report H. Rept. 107-350 filed. (text of conference report: CR H10503-10820)
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 107-350 filed.(text of conference report: CR H10503-10820)
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Mr. Lewis (CA) moved that the House close portions of the conference.
The Speaker appointed conferees for consideration of all other matters of the House bill and all other matters of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Young (FL), Lewis (CA), and Obey.
The Speaker appointed conferees for consideration of Division A of the House bill and Division A of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Lewis (CA), Young (FL), Skeen, Hobson, Bonilla, Nethercutt, Cunningham, Frelinghuysen, Tiahrt, Murtha, Dicks, Sabo, Visclosky, Moran (VA), and Obey.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 370 - 44 (Roll no. 494). (consideration: CR H9311-9318)
House roll call 494 · Individual votesThe previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Obey motion to instruct conferees.
Mr. Obey moved that the House instruct conferees.
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Lewis (CA) asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate insists on its amendment, asks for a conference, appoints conferees Inouye, Hollings, Byrd, Leahy, Harkin, Dorgan, Durbin, Reid, Feinstein, Kohl, Stevens, Cochran, Specter, Domenici, Bond, McConnell, Shelby, Gregg and Hutchison.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. (text: CR 12/10/2001 S12779-12812)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.(text: CR 12/10/2001 S12779-12812)
The commmittee substitute to H.R. 3338 was ruled out of order by the chair.
Motion to waive the Budget Act with respect to the measure (re: the commmittee substitute) rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 50. Record Vote Number: 357.
Senate roll call 357 · Individual votesMotion to waive the Budget Act with respect to the measure (re: the committee substitute) made in Senate.
Point of order against the committee substitute raised in Senate.
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S12586-12676)
Motion to waive the Budget Act with respect to the measure (Division II of the motion re: the emergency designation on page 398 of the committee substitute to H.R. 3338) rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 48. Record Vote Number: 355.
Senate roll call 355 · Individual votesMotion to waive the Budget Act with respect to the measure (Division I of the motion re: the emergency designation on page 397 of the committee substitute to H.R. 3338) rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 48. Record Vote Number: 354.
Senate roll call 354 · Individual votesThe motion to waive the CBA was subsequently divided into Division I and Division II.
Motion to waive the Budget Act with respect to the measure made in Senate.
Point of order against the measure raised in Senate.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S12476-12529; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S12477-12500)
By Senator Inouye from Committee on Appropriations filed written report. Report No. 107-109.
By Senator Inouye from Committee on Appropriations filed written report. Report No. 107-109.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 254.
Committee on Appropriations. Reported by Senator Inouye with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Committee on Appropriations. Reported by Senator Inouye with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense. Approved for full committee consideration with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 406 - 20 (Roll no. 458).
House roll call 458 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 406 - 20 (Roll no. 458).
House roll call 458 · Individual votesThe House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
VOTE POSTPONED - The Chair put the question on the amendment offered by George Miller of California and announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Walsh demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the provisions of H.Res 296 the Chair postponed further proceedings on the amendment until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Mr. Rogers asked unanimous consent that debate on the George Miller (CA) amendment and all amendments thereto, be limited to not to exceed 60 minutes, equally divided and controlled. Agreed to without objection.
DEBATE - Mr. Young of Florida asked unanimous consent that debate on the LoBiondo amendment and all amendments thereto, be limited to not to exceed 30 minutes, equally divided and controlled. Agreed to without objection.
POINT OF ORDER RESERVED - Messrs. Young of Florida and Obey of Wisconsin each reserved a point of order against the LoBiondo amendment.
DEBATE - Mr. Young of Florida asked unanimous consent that debate on the Lowey amendment and all amendments thereto, be limited to not to exceed one hour, equally divided and controlled.
RESERVATION OF POINT OF ORDER - Mr. Lewis of California reserved a point of order against the Lowey amendment.
DEBATE - Mr. Rogers asked unanimous consent that debate on the Visclosky amendment and all amendments thereto, be limited for not to exceed 30 minutes, equally divided and controlled. Agreed to without objection.
RESERVATION OF POINT OF ORDER - Mr. Rogers reserved a point of order against the Visclosky amendment.
RESERVATION OF POINT OF ORDER - Mr. Lewis of California reserved a point of order against the Filner amendment.
Mr. Lipinski raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Lipinski made a point of order against the provsions of the bill regarding the Airport and Airway Trust Fund on page 184. The Chair sustained the point of order.
Mr. Petri raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Petri made a point of order against the provisions of the bill regarding the Highway Trust Fund on page 184. The Chair sustained the point of order.
Mr. Young (AK) raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Young of Alaska made a point of order against the provisions of the bill regarding the Airport and Airway Trust Fund on page 183. The Chair sustained the point of order.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Young of Florida asked unanimous consent that section 803 of the bill be stricken. Agreed to without objection.
DEBATE - Mr. Young of Florida asked unanimous consent that debate on the Obey amendment and all amendments thereto, continue for not to exceed 90 minutes, equally divided and controlled. Agreed to without objection.
RESERVATION OF POINT OF ORDER - Mr. Young of Florida reserved a point of order against the Obey amendment.
POINT OF ORDER RESERVED - Mr. Lewis of California reserved a point of order against the Kucinich amendment.
On sustaining the ruling of the Chair. Agreed to by recorded vote: 275 - 141 (Roll no. 456).
House roll call 456 · Individual votesCALL IN COMMITTEE - The question was put on sustaining to the ruling of the Chair and by voice vote, the Chair announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Filner demanded a recorded vote and pending that, made a point of no quorum. The Chair subsequently announced that following a quorum call, a five-minute vote would ensue on the question of sustaining to the ruling of the Chair.
Mr. Filner appealed the ruling of the Chair. The question was then put on sustaining the ruling of the Chair.
POINT OF ORDER RESERVED - Mr. Lewis of California reserved a point of order against the Filner amendment.
DEBATE - Unless otherwise specified, all debate on amendments will proceed under the five-minute rule.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3338.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Dave Camp to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 296 and Rule XXIII.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3338 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 296. (consideration: CR H8441-8551; text of Title I as reported in House: CR H8457-8458; text of Title I I as reported in House: CR H8458-8459; text of Title III as reported in House: CR H8459-8461; text of Title IV as reported in House: CR H8461; text of Title V as reported in House: CR H8461; text of Title VI as reported in House: CR H8461; text of Title VII as reported in House: CR H8461; text of Title VIII as reported in House: CR H8461-8472, H8473-8474, H8480, H8506-8512, H8550)
Rule H. Res. 296 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 296 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3338 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-298, by Mr. Lewis (CA).
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 179.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-298, by Mr. Lewis (CA).
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Mar 9, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3338 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3338 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3338 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3338 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.