PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3334 / 118th Congress

STOP CCP Act

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Official summary

Version 07 · Reported to House · Sep 12, 2024

Sanctioning Tyrannical and Oppressive People within the Chinese Communist Party Act or the STOP CCP Act

This bill requires the President to impose visa- and property-blocking sanctions on any member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee whom the President determines plays a significant role in developing or implementing policies that (1) violate the autonomy of Hong Kong; (2) harass or intimidate the people of Taiwan; or (3) contribute to the oppression of individuals or groups in China, including Uyghur Muslims. The President must also impose sanctions on the adult family members of such sanctioned persons.

The President may waive the sanctions for renewable periods of up to 60 days by certifying to Congress that the waiver is vital to U.S. national security interests.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

The President may terminate any sanctions imposed after certifying to Congress that China's government and the CCP have ceased

the genocide of the Uyghur Muslim population;

all threats, military exercises, and aggression toward Taiwan;

undermining the autonomy of Hong Kong; and

any efforts to steal the intellectual property of U.S. persons.

The President may also terminate sanctions after certifying to Congress that the sanctioned person has renounced membership in the CCP and taken steps to denounce or remediate the conduct for which sanctions were imposed.

Any certifications related to termination of sanctions must also be publicly available on a federal government website.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. McClain, Lisa C. [R-MI-9] · R–MI

Committees

  • Foreign Relations Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
  • Foreign Affairs Committee
9 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 243 - 174 (Roll no. 452).

    House roll call 452 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 243 - 174 (Roll no. 452).

    House roll call 452 · Individual votes
  5. The House adopted the amendments en gros as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

  6. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  7. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3334.

  8. The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.

  9. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5801-5803)

  10. Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 3334 as unfinished business.

  11. On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.

  12. Mr. Moylan moved that the committee rise.

  13. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1486, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 4.

  14. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1486, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 3.

  15. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1486, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Amo amendment No. 2.

  16. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Nunn (IA) amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Amo demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  17. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1486, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Nunn (IA) amendment No. 1.

  18. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3334.

  19. The Speaker designated the Honorable Virginia Foxx to act as Chairwoman of the Committee.

  20. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 1486 and Rule XVIII.

  21. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3334, H.R. 8205, H.R. 8790 and H. Res. 1469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3334 and H.R. 8790 under a structured rule and H.R. 8205 and H. Res. 1469 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each measure with one motion to recommit on H.R. 3334, H.R. 8790, and H.R. 8205.

  22. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1486. (consideration: CR H5767-5772)

  23. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1486 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3334, H.R. 8205, H.R. 8790 and H. Res. 1469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3334 and H.R. 8790 under a structured rule and H.R. 8205 and H. Res. 1469 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each measure with one motion to recommit on H.R. 3334, H.R. 8790, and H.R. 8205.

  24. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 560.

  25. Committee on the Judiciary discharged.

  26. Committee on the Judiciary discharged.

  27. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Foreign Affairs. H. Rept. 118-664, Part I.

  28. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Foreign Affairs. H. Rept. 118-664, Part I.

  29. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 28 - 22.

  30. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  31. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  32. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  33. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  34. Introduced in House

  35. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: May 20, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3334 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3334 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3334 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3334 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources