PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on International Security, International Organizations and Human Rights.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 19, 1993
Prohibits the U.S. representative to the United Nations (UN) from voting to approve, expand, or extend any UN peacekeeping, peacemaking, or peace-enforcing operation unless, at least 15 days before such vote, the President notifies the appropriate congressional committees of: (1) the total estimated cost of the operation; (2) the source of funding for the U.S. contribution to the operation and whether the funding will require a budget request or an amendment to an existing one, a reprogramming of existing funds, or a request for supplemental appropriations; (3) the anticipated duration, scope, and termination date of the operation; (4) the operation's goals; and (5) the U.S. interests that will be served by such operation.
People & committees
Rep. Rogers, Harold [R-KY-5] · R–KY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on International Security, International Organizations and Human Rights.
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3317 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3317 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3317 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3317 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.