TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: National Heritage Areas Program Title II: Designation of National Heritage Areas Title III: Studies of Potential National Heritage Areas Title IV: Amendments to Existing Heritage Corridors National Heritage Areas Act of 1996 - Title I: National Heritage Areas Program - Prescribes eligibility criteria for designation as a National Heritage Area, including the presence of a cohesive assemblage of natural, historic, cultural, or recreational resources that represent distinctive aspects of American heritage worthy of conservation and that are best managed through public-private partnerships. (Sec. 102) Allows designation only by an Act of the Congress. Conditions such designation on the Secretary of the Interior's approval of an Area feasibility study and compact, signed by the Governor of each State in which the Area is located. (Sec. 103) Establishes within the Department of the Interior a National Heritage Areas Partnership Program to assist the Secretary in: (1) making grants and providing technical assistance to units of government and management entities; (2) evaluating areas nominated for designation; and (3) advising State and local governments, nonprofit organizations, and other appropriate entities on issues pertaining to the Program. Requires the Secretary to monitor Area eligibility for assistance and ensure compact compliance. Prohibits the Secretary from providing grants to an Area and limits technical assistance after ten years after its designation. Prohibits the Secretary from providing technical assistance or grants to an Area if a heritage plan is not developed and forwarded to the Secretary within the specified time. (Sec. 104) Sets forth provisions regarding Area feasibility studies, compacts, heritage plans, and management entity composition and duties which shall include submitting a heritage plan to the Secretary and to the Governor of each State in which the Area is located. (Sec. 106) Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) withdrawal of designated Areas; (2) restrictions on an Area's redesignation; (3) private property protection with respect to such Areas; and (4) imposition of environmental and other specified standards. (Sec. 109) Prohibits the Secretary from requiring any multiple use limitations on Federal lands as a condition for signing a compact, providing a grant, or determining eligibility for assistance under this Act or for the receipt of any form of Federal assistance in connection with National Heritage Area status. (Sec. 112) Authorizes appropriations. Specifies funding limitations. Prohibits such funds from being used to supplement funding or programs at any National Park System unit. (Sec. 113) Prohibits the Secretary from making grants or providing technical assistant under this title after FY 2012. Title II: Designation of National Heritage Areas - Provides for the designation as part of the National Heritage Area Partnership Program of: (1) the Essex, Ohio & Erie Canal, Steel Industry, Tennessee Civil War, and Cache La Poudre National Heritage Areas; (2) the Augusta Canal and South Carolina National Heritage Corridors; and (3) the Vancouver National Historic Reserve. (Specifies conditions for the continued use by Vancouver, Washington, of that portion of National Park Service (NPS) property currently used by that city for the Pearson Airpark runway and taxiway. Prohibits general aviation aircraft from being allowed at the Airpark after April 6, 2022, unless a continuation is expressly authorized by an Act of the Congress enacted.) Title III: Studies of Potential National Heritage Areas - Directs the Secretary to study and report to specified congressional committees on the suitability and feasibility of designating as National Heritage Areas: (1) the Puente-Chino Hills National Heritage Corridor; and (2) Tryon County, in the Mohawk Valley of New York, and the Country of the Six Nations (Iroquois Confederacy). Requires that the latter study include a strategy for protection and management of the Oriskany Battlefield National Historic Landmark. Title IV: Amendments to Existing Heritage Corridors - Amends Federal provisions concerning the Blackstone River National Heritage Corridor in Massachusetts and Rhode Island to: (1) modify Corridor boundaries; (2) revise provisions governing tenure on, and extension of, the Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Commission; (3) require revisions of the Cultural Heritage and Land Management Plan (subject to the Secretary's approval) to address the boundary change made by the National Heritage Area Act of 1995 and to include a natural resource inventory of areas or features that should be protected, restored, managed, or acquired because of their contribution to the understanding of national cultural landscape values; and (4) authorize appropriations and limit Federal funding to 50 percent of the total project costs or assistance. (Sec. 402) Amends the Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 to require the Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage Commission to study and report to the Secretary, who shall report to the appropriate congressional committees, on whether the Joliet Army Ammunition Plant and the Calumet-Sag and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canals should be added to the Corridor.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3305 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3305 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3305 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3305 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.