PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.330 / 113th Congress

Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial Act

Became Public Law No: 113-132.

Official summary

Version 82 · Passed Senate without amendment · Jul 9, 2014

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the House reported version is repeated here.)

Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial Act - Designates a memorial located at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California, as the Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial, in honor of current and former members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross.

Prohibits the designation of such memorial from being construed to require or permit the use of federal funds for any related purpose.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-42] · R–CA

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
12 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 113-132.

  2. Became Public Law No: 113-132.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4355-4364; text as passed Senate: CR S4355)

  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S4355-4364; text as passed Senate: CR S4355)

  10. Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 226.

  11. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H6853)

  12. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H6853)

  13. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 330.

  14. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6853-6854)

  15. Mr. Young (AK) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  16. Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 26.

  17. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 113-79.

  18. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 113-79.

  19. Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

  20. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  21. Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation Discharged.

  22. Referred to the Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation.

  23. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  24. Introduced in House

  25. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.330 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.330 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.330 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.330 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources