PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3292 / 106th Congress

Cat Island National Wildlife Refuge Establishment Act

Became Public Law No: 106-369.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Oct 5, 2000

Cat Island National Wildlife Refuge Establishment Act - Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to establish the Cat Island National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana and to acquire lands and waters within the prescribed acquisition boundary. Directs the Secretary to establish the Refuge by publication of a notice in the Federal Register and local publications whenever sufficient property has been acquired to constitute an area that can be efficiently managed as a refuge.Directs the Secretary, in providing opportunities for compatible fish- and wildlife-oriented recreation on the Refuge, to ensure that hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education and interpretation are the priority public uses of the Refuge.Authorizes appropriations.Designates a building proposed to be located within the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge on Assateague Island, Virginia, as the Herbert H. Bateman Education And Administrative Center.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Baker, Richard H. [R-LA-6] · R–LA

Committees

  • Environment and Public Works Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 106-369.

    2. Became Public Law No: 106-369.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H9843)

    9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by voice vote.(consideration: CR H9843)

    10. At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Faleomavaega objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

    11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with debate on the motion.

    12. Mr. Hansen moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments. (consideration: CR H9621-9622)

    13. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    14. Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S10009-10010)

    15. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S10009-10010)

    16. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S10009-10010)

    17. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 906.

    18. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Smith, of NH with amendments. With written report No. 106-459.

    19. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Smith, of NH with amendments. With written report No. 106-459.

    20. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

    21. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Committee consideration and Mark Up Session held.

    22. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

    23. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    24. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4601-4602)

    25. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H4601-4602)

    26. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3292.

    27. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4601-4602)

    28. Mr. Saxton moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    29. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 364.

    30. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-659.

    31. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-659.

    32. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    33. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    34. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    35. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    36. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    37. Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans.

    38. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

    39. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    40. Introduced in House

    41. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3292 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3292 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3292 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3292 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources