PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic and Commercial Law.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 14, 1993
College Financial Aid Protection Act of 1993 - Exempts from the antitrust laws agreements, or attempts to agree, by two or more institutions of higher education, on: (1) financial assistance that may be provided to any individual by any of such institutions or by the family of such individual, in connection with enrolling in and attending any of such institutions; (2) a formula for determining such assistance; (3) any matter relating to requiring individuals who receive such assistance to engage in activities to obtain income to be expended to attend any of such institutions; (4) student fees; or (5) communication among such institutions regarding financial assistance provided, or to be provided, to such individual, or a plan, projection, or budget assumption regarding future student fees.
People & committees
Rep. Towns, Edolphus [D-NY-10] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic and Commercial Law.
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2449)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3289 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3289 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3289 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3289 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.