PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3286 / 103rd Congress

To amend the Act establishing Golden Gate National Recreation Area to provide for the management of the Presidio by the Secretary of the Interior, and for other purposes.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Nov 15, 1993

Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to enter into leases, at fair market rental, for all or part of the Letterman-LAIR complex at the Presidio of San Francisco, California, for scientific, research, or educational uses. Requires the Secretary to use the proceeds from such leases for the preservation, restoration, and operation expenses incurred with respect to Presidio properties.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Pelosi, Nancy [D-CA-8] · D–CA

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    2. Received in the Senate.

    3. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    4. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

    5. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    6. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    7. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    8. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9622-9623)

    9. Mr. Vento moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    10. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 197.

    11. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-363.

    12. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-363.

    13. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    14. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    15. Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Prior to Referral (Oct 26, 93).

    16. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    17. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2442)

    18. Introduced in House

    19. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3286 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3286 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3286 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3286 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources