PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3275 / 107th Congress

To implement the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings to strengthen criminal laws relating to attacks on places of public use, to implement the International Convention of the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, to combat terrorism and defend the Nation against terrorist acts, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 107-197.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Jun 14, 2002

Title I: Suppression of Terrorist Bombings - Terrorist Bombings Convention Implementation Act of 2002 - Amends the Federal criminal code to prohibit unlawfully detonating an explosive in or against a place of public use, a state or government facility, a public transportation system, or an infrastructure facility, with intent to cause: (1) death or serious bodily injury; or (2) extensive destruction of such place where such destruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss. Criminalizes conspiracy and attempts to commit such crimes. Sets penalties for violations.Delineates the jurisdictional bases for the covered offenses. Exempts from jurisdiction: (1) the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under the law of war, which are governed by that law; (2) activities undertaken by military forces of a state in the exercise of their official duties; or (3) offenses committed within the United States, where the alleged offender and the victims are U.S. citizens and the alleged offender is found in the United States, or where jurisdiction is predicated solely on the nationality of the victims or the alleged offender and the offense has no substantial effect on interstate or foreign commerce.Title II: Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism - Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism Convention Implementation Act of 2002 - Amends the code to prohibit, unlawfully and willfully providing or collecting funds, directly or indirectly, with the intention that such funds be used, or with the knowledge that such funds are to be used, in full or in part, to carry out: (1) an act which constitutes an offense within the scope of specified listed terrorism treaties; or (2) any other act intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a civilian or to specified others when the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to do or abstain from doing any act. Criminalizes conspiracy and attempts to commit such crimes. Prohibits knowingly concealing or disguising the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of material support or resources to terrorists, or of any funds provided or collected or any proceeds of such funds.Delineates the jurisdictional bases for the covered offenses and includes jurisdiction over perpetrators of offenses abroad who are subsequently found within the United States. Sets penalties for violations. Creates a civil penalty of at least $10,000 payable to the United States, against any legal entity in the United States, or organized under U.S. law, including any of its states, districts, commonwealths, territories, or possessions, if any person responsible for the management or control of that legal entity has, in that capacity, committed a specified offense.Title III: Ancillary Measures - Makes provisions of this Act predicates under the wiretap statute, and under code provisions relating to the provision of material support to terrorists and relating to the forfeiture of funds, proceeds, and instrumentalities. Adds offenses under this Act to those defined as a "Federal crime of terrorism" under the code.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21] · R–TX

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 107-197.

    2. Became Public Law No: 107-197.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H3633-3635; text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H3633-3635)

    9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H3633-3635; text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H3633-3635)

    10. Mr. Sensenbrenner asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendment.

    11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    12. Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 83 - 1. Record Vote Number: 154.

      Senate roll call 154 · Individual votes
    13. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 83 - 1. Record Vote Number: 154.

      Senate roll call 154 · Individual votes
    14. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S5574)

    15. Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.

    16. Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.

    17. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

    18. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 381 - 36 (Roll no. 501). (text: CR H10358-10360)

      House roll call 501 · Individual votes
    19. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    20. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 381 - 36 (Roll no. 501).(text: CR H10358-10360)

      House roll call 501 · Individual votes
    21. Considered as unfinished business. (CR H10426-10427)

    22. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

    23. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3275.

    24. Considered under suspension of the rules. (CR H10358-10363)

    25. Mr. Sensenbrenner moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    26. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 185.

    27. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 107-307.

    28. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 107-307.

    29. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    30. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    31. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

    32. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    33. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    34. Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime.

    35. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    36. Introduced in House

    37. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3275 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3275 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3275 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3275 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources