To prohibit for a 5-year period the award of contracts for the procurement of milk products for schools and military bases to companies convicted of violating any of the antitrust laws in connection with a contract with the Department of Defense or with any school or other institution eligible for payments under the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 or the National School Lunch Act.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary and Vocational Education.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 7, 1993
Amends the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 and the National School Lunch Act to prohibit for a five-year period the award of contracts for the procurement of milk for schools to companies convicted of violating any of the antitrust laws in connection with a contract with any school, food service authority, or other institution eligible for program payments under such Acts. Prohibits for a five-year period the award of contracts for the procurement of milk for military bases to companies convicted of violating any of the antitrust laws in connection with a contract with the Department of Defense.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jul 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3242 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3242 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3242 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3242 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.