PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3239 / 116th Congress

Humanitarian Standards for Individuals in Customs and Border Protection Custody Act

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Official summary

Version 53 · Passed House · Jul 24, 2019

Humanitarian Standards for Individuals in Customs and Border Protection Custody Act

This bill imposes requirements and standards related to the care of aliens in U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) custody.

CBP shall conduct an initial health screening of each alien in custody to identify those with acute conditions and high-risk vulnerabilities and to provide appropriate healthcare. CBP shall conduct the screening within 12 hours of each alien's arrival at a CBP facility, and within 6 hours for certain priority individuals such as children, pregnant women, and those with disabilities.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

The bill imposes various requirements related to the services, personnel, and infrastructure for providing such screenings, such as providing interpreters, chaperones, and mental health treatment when necessary.

CBP shall ensure detainees have access to drinking water, toilets, sanitation facilities, hygiene products, food, and shelter. The bill imposes certain standards relating to such requirements, such as the minimum amount of drinking water for each detainee and the acceptable temperature range of the shelters.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) shall enter into memoranda of understanding with various emergency government relief agencies to address instances when surge capacity is necessary.

The Inspector General of DHS shall conduct unannounced inspections of ports of entry, border patrol stations, and detention facilities and report the results to Congress. The Government Accountability Office shall assess CBP's management of such facilities, whether CBP and DHS processes are in compliance with this bill's requirements, and the behavior of CBP personnel in carrying out this bill.

DHS shall publicly release on its website, on a quarterly basis, aggregate data on complaints of sexual abuse at CBP facilities.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Ruiz, Raul [D-CA-36] · D–CA

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Homeland Security Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
160 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On passage Passed by recorded vote: 233 - 195 (Roll no. 507).

    House roll call 507 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 233 - 195 (Roll no. 507).

    House roll call 507 · Individual votes
  5. On motion to recommit with instructions Agreed to by recorded vote: 239 - 192 (Roll no. 506).

    House roll call 506 · Individual votes
  6. The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.

  7. Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kinzinger motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to add a new section to the bill stating that it is the sense of Congress that the men and women of the U.S. Border Patrol should be commended for continuing to carry out their duties in a professional manner.

  8. Mr. Kinzinger moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H7348)

  9. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H7348, H7350)

  10. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of Rule 19, the Chair postponed further proceedings on H.R. 3239.

  11. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  12. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3239.

  13. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 509, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kuster amendment No. 2.

  14. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 509, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kuster amendment No. 1.

  15. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3239.

  16. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 509 and Rule XVIII.

  17. The Speaker designated the Honorable Salud O. Carbajal to act as Chairman of the Committee.

  18. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 397 and H.R. 3239. Resolution provides for consideration of both H.R. 397 and H.R. 3239 under structured rules. Resolution also provides that it shall be in order on the legislative day of July 25, 2019 or July 26, 2019 that the House suspend the rules. Resolution additionally provides for proceedings from the period from July 29, 2019 through September 6, 2019.

  19. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 509. (consideration: CR H7336-7345; text: CR H7340-7342)

  20. Rule H. Res. 509 passed House.

  21. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 509 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 397 and H.R. 3239. Resolution provides for consideration of both H.R. 397 and H.R. 3239 under structured rules. Resolution also provides that it shall be in order on the legislative day of July 25, 2019 or July 26, 2019 that the House suspend the rules. Resolution additionally provides for proceedings from the period from July 29, 2019 through September 6, 2019.

  22. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 121.

  23. Committee on Homeland Security discharged.

  24. Committee on Homeland Security discharged.

  25. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 116-162, Part I.

  26. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 116-162, Part I.

  27. Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 13.

  28. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  29. Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship.

  30. Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security, Facilitation, and Operations.

  31. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  32. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  33. Introduced in House

  34. Introduced in House

  35. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4402)

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3239 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3239 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3239 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3239 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources