PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 117-31.
Congressional Research Service
Version 59 · House agreed to Senate amendment · Jul 29, 2021
Emergency Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021
This bill provides FY2021 supplemental appropriations for federal agencies to respond to the events at the U.S. Capitol Complex on January 6, 2021, and assist Afghan refugees.
It also provides supplemental appropriations for the legislative branch to address COVID-19 and modifies requirements for certain programs that provide special immigrant status to eligible nationals of Afghanistan or Iraq,
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
This title provides appropriations for the National Guard to respond to the events at the U.S. Capitol Complex on January 6, 2021, and for related purposes.
The title also provides appropriations to the Department of Defense for overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid.
TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
This title provides appropriations to the Administration for Children and Families for refugee and entrance assistance activities.
The funding must be used for activities for Afghan individuals within the United States who have been granted special immigrant status.
TITLE III--LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
This title provides appropriations for the legislative branch to respond to the events at the U.S. Capitol Complex on January 6, 2021, and address COVID-19.
Specifically, the title provides appropriations for
the Senate,
the House of Representatives,
the U.S. Capitol Police,
U.S. Capitol Police Mutual Aid Reimbursements, and
the Architect of the Capitol (AOC).
The title also provides appropriations for payments to the widows and heirs of deceased Members of Congress, including (1) Susan M. Wright, widow of the late Representative Ronald Wright; and (2) the heirs of the late Representative Alcee Hastings.
(Sec. 301) This section designates the wellness program of the U.S. Capitol Police as the Howard C. Liebengood Center for Wellness.
(Sec. 302) This section modifies the salary cap for the U.S. Capitol Police during 2021.
(Sec. 310) This section prohibits funds from being used to install permanent, above-ground fencing around the perimeter, or any portion thereof, of the U.S. Capitol Grounds.
(Sec. 311) With congressional approval, the AOC may accept contributions of, and incur obligations and make expenditures out of available appropriations for, supplies, products, and services necessary to respond to an emergency involving the safety of human life or the protection of property, as determined or declared by the Capitol Police Board.
TITLE IV--BILATERAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE
This title provides appropriations to the Department of State for migration and refugee assistance to address humanitarian needs in Afghanistan and to assist Afghan refugees.
The title also provides appropriations to the State Department for the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund.
(Sec. 401) This section increases the number of special immigrant visas available to qualified Afghan nationals who worked for the U.S. government or a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) mission in Afghanistan, extends the deadline for applying for such visas, and relaxes certain qualifications.
All applicants for such a visa must establish that the applicant was employed with the U.S. government or a NATO mission for one year, where currently some applicants must prove two years of employment. This section also eliminates a requirement that the applicant faces an ongoing serious threat in Afghanistan due to such employment.
Furthermore, for an applicant qualifying for a visa by performing duties for U.S. military personnel stationed with a NATO mission, this section eliminates a requirement that the duties performed qualify as sensitive and trusted duties.
This section also relaxes limits to appealing rejections for applications for such visas.
(Sec. 402) This bill authorizes the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to jointly postpone the medical exam requirement for individuals seeking entry into the United States under the program described in Section 401.
If an individual receives such a postponement, DHS shall ensure to the greatest extent possible that individual undergoes a medical exam no later than 30 days after admission into the United States. Such an individual's status as a lawful permanent resident shall be conditional until the individual undergoes the required medical exam.
(Sec. 403) This section modifies the immigration benefits of the surviving family members of certain deceased individuals.
The surviving spouse or child of a U.S. government employee abroad shall qualify as a special immigrant if that employee performed at least 15 years of faithful service or was killed in the line of duty.
This section also expands surviving family member benefits for certain programs that provide special immigrant status to eligible nationals of Afghanistan or Iraq, including the program described in Section 401. Specifically, if an individual submitted an application to the Chief of Mission that included an accompanying spouse or child and that application would have been approved but for the individual's death, the surviving spouse or child shall remain eligible to receive a visa under the respective program. Currently, such survivor rights only apply if the deceased individual's petition was approved.
(Sec. 404) If an individual has an approved petition under a program that provided special immigrant status to translators who worked for the Armed Forces in Afghanistan or Iraq but a visa is not immediately available, the State Department or DHS may convert that petition to an approved petition under another program which provides special immigrant status to certain Iraqi nationals, if there are visas available under that second program. (DHS and the State Department currently only have the authority to convert petitions filed before October 1, 2008.)
TITLE V--DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
This title provides appropriations to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for state and local law enforcement assistance.
DOJ must use the funds for restoring funds that were used for extraordinary law enforcement and related costs directly associated with protection of the President-elect from November 4, 2020, until the inauguration of the President-elect as President.
TITLE VI--GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS ACT
(Sec. 601) This section specifies that the funds provided by this bill are in addition to funds otherwise appropriated for the fiscal year involved.
(Sec. 602) Funds provided by this bill may not remain available beyond the current fiscal year, unless this bill provides otherwise.
(Sec. 603) Unless otherwise specified by this bill, the funds provided by this bill are subject to the authorities and conditions that apply to the applicable appropriations account for FY2021.
(Sec. 604) This section specifies that funding provided by this bill may only be used for the purposes specifically described in the bill. The section includes an exception for funds used to restore amounts for obligations incurred prior to the date of the enactment of this bill.
(Sec. 605) This section specifies that the term coronavirus in this bill means SARS-CoV-2 or another coronavirus with pandemic potential.
(Sec. 606) This section provides that amounts designated by this bill as emergency requirements are only available (or rescinded or transferred, if applicable) if the President subsequently designates the amounts and transmits the designations to Congress.
(Sec. 607) This section specifies that the emergency funds that are transferred pursuant to this bill retain the emergency designation.
People & committees
Rep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3] · D–CT
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 117-31.
Became Public Law No: 117-31.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 416 - 11 (Roll no. 250). (text: CR H4265-4267)
House roll call 250 · Individual votesResolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 416 - 11 (Roll no. 250).(text: CR H4265-4267)
House roll call 250 · Individual votesMessage on Senate action sent to the House.
The House proceeded with 40 minutes of debate on the motion to suspend the rules and concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 3237.
Ms. DeLauro moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H4265-4270)
Passed Senate, under the order of 7/29/21, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 98 - 0. Record Vote Number: 287.
Senate roll call 287 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate, under the order of 7/29/21, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 98 - 0. Record Vote Number: 287.
Senate roll call 287 · Individual votesMeasure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S5154-5156)
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 63.
Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 212, 3 Present (Roll no. 156). (text: CR H2617-2621)
House roll call 156 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 212, 3 Present (Roll no. 156).(text: CR H2617-2621)
House roll call 156 · Individual votesOn motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 218 (Roll no. 155).
House roll call 155 · Individual votesThe previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
Mr. Gonzales, Tony moved to recommit to the Committee on Appropriations. (text: CR H2630-2631)
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3237.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3233 and H.R. 3237. Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3233 and H.R. 3237 under a closed rule. The resolution provides that the previous question shall be ordered on both bills without intervening motion except one hour of debate and one motion to recommit.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 409. (consideration: CR H2617-2632)
Rule H. Res. 409 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 409 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3233 and H.R. 3237. Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3233 and H.R. 3237 under a closed rule. The resolution provides that the previous question shall be ordered on both bills without intervening motion except one hour of debate and one motion to recommit.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3237 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3237 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3237 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3237 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.