PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3224 / 105th Congress

Privacy Protection Act of 1998

Committee Hearings Held.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 12, 1998

Privacy Protection Act of 1998 - Amends the Federal criminal code to prohibit and set penalties for persistently following or chasing any individual in the United States for the purpose of obtaining a visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression of that or another individual (the image) if: (1) the image was intended to be, or was in fact, sold, published, or transmitted in interstate or foreign commerce, or the person attempting to capture such image moved in commerce to do so; (2) the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy from such intrusions and has taken reasonable steps to ensure that privacy; (3) the individual has a reasonable fear that death or bodily injury will result from that following or chasing; and (4) the obtaining of the image is for commercial purposes. Authorizes a person subjected to a violation to obtain appropriate relief in a civil action against the person engaging in the violation. Directs the court to allow the prevailing party a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs. Specifies that it is not a defense to such a prosecution or civil action that no image was captured or sold. Subjects to a Federal criminal charge or civil liability only a person physically present at the time. Makes this Act inapplicable with respect to official law enforcement activities.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Gallegly, Elton [R-CA-23] · R–CA

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
6 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Committee Hearings Held.

  2. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  3. Introduced in House

  4. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3224 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3224 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3224 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3224 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources