To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow penalty-free distributions from qualified retirement plans of individuals residing in Presidentially declared disaster areas and to allow relief from certain limitations on the deductibility of casualty losses sustained in such disaster areas.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 3, 1999
Amends the Internal Revenue Code, with respect to exceptions to 10-percent additional tax on early distributions from qualified retirement plans, to allow penalty-free distributions from such plans (used within 90 days of distribution) for individuals residing in presidentially declared disaster areas.Makes the current casualty loss limitation of ten percent of adjusted gross income inapplicable to losses incurred in such areas after July 31, 1999. Reduces a taxpayer's gross income by the amount of such disaster loss deduction (thereby making the deduction available to both itemizing and non-itemizing taxpayers).
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3215 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3215 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3215 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3215 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.