PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3215 / 104th Congress

To amend title 18, United States Code, to repeal the provision relating to Federal employees contracting or trading with Indians.

Became Public Law No: 104-178.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 29, 1996

Amends the Federal criminal code to repeal specified provisions barring Federal employees from contracting or trading with Indians, with exceptions.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hayworth, J. D. [R-AZ-6] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 104-178.

    2. Became Public Law No: 104-178.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Received in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9316-9317)

    9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Received in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9316-9317)

    10. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    11. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    12. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    13. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    14. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8603-8604)

    15. Mr. Moorhead moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    16. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 352.

    17. Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 104-681.

    18. Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 104-681.

    19. Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 0.

    20. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    21. Subcommittee on Crime Discharged.

    22. Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime.

    23. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    24. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E521)

    25. Introduced in House

    26. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3215 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3215 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3215 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3215 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources