Second-Stage Small Business Development Act of 2005
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 118.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Jul 28, 2005
Second-Stage Small Business Development Act of 2005 - Directs the Administrator of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to carry out a four-year pilot program to make grants to eligible entities for the development of peer learning opportunities for second-stage small businesses.Defines as a second-stage small business one that: (1) has experienced high growth demonstrated by an average annual revenue or employee growth rate of at least 15 percent during the preceding three years; (2) does not exceed the size standard for the North American Industrial Classification System code of a small business; and (3) has any three of specified characteristics, including owning proprietary intellectual property, addressing an underserved or growing market, and ownership by minority individuals, service-disabled veterans, or women.
Provides a: (1) grant formula, with a minimum amount of $50,000; and (2) 50% matching funds requirement.
Requires: (1) quarterly reports from grant recipients to the Administrator on the use of grant funds; (2) an annual report from the Administrator to the President and Congress evaluating the pilot program; and (3) a Comptroller General pilot program evaluation and report to Congress and the Administrator. Terminates the pilot program on September 30, 2009.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Read full official summaryShow less
Provides privacy requirements applicable to small business development centers administering pilot program assistance.
Source last updated: Dec 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3207 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3207 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3207 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3207 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.