To delay the privatization of the Office of Federal Investigations of the Office of Personnel Management in order to allow sufficient time for a thorough review to be conducted as to the feasibility and desirability of any such privatization, and for other purposes.

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 28, 1996

Provides that during the two-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act: (1) the Office of Federal Investigations (Office) within the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) shall continue to perform all of its current functions on the day before enactment; and (2) the number of full-time equivalent positions within the Office may not be reduced in connections with any efforts to terminate such office or to privatize its functions. Requires the General Accounting Office and OPM to report to the Congress on the feasibility and desirability of terminating the Office and privatizing its current Office functions.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Davis, Tom [R-VA-11] · R–VA

Committees

Oversight and Government Reform Committee

6 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

May 22, 1996
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Apr 2, 1996
Referred to the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology.
Apr 2, 1996
Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil Service.
Mar 28, 1996
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.
Mar 28, 1996
Introduced in House
Mar 28, 1996
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Mar 28, 1996 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Mar 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3189 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3189, 104th Congress: To delay the privatization of the Office of Federal Investigations of the Office of Personnel Management in order to allow sufficient time for a thorough review to be conducted as to the feasibility and desirability of any such privatization, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3189

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-03-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3189/BILLS-104hr3189ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-03-23T12:18:56Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.3189 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3189 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3189, 104th Congress: To delay the privatization of the Office of Federal Investigations of the Office of Personnel Management in order to allow sufficient time for a thorough review to be conducted as to the feasibility and desirability of any such privatization, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3189

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-03-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3189/BILLS-104hr3189ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-03-23T12:18:56Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3189 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3189 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3189, 104th Congress: To delay the privatization of the Office of Federal Investigations of the Office of Personnel Management in order to allow sufficient time for a thorough review to be conducted as to the feasibility and desirability of any such privatization, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3189

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-03-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3189/BILLS-104hr3189ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-03-23T12:18:56Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3189 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3189 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3189, 104th Congress: To delay the privatization of the Office of Federal Investigations of the Office of Personnel Management in order to allow sufficient time for a thorough review to be conducted as to the feasibility and desirability of any such privatization, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3189

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-03-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3189/BILLS-104hr3189ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-03-23T12:18:56Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3189 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.