To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to require the value of public benefits created by State and local governments and nonprofit entities to be offset against the fee charged for certain rights-of-way held by those entities.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 30, 2001
Amends the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to direct the Secretary concerned (the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture) to reduce the charge for any right-of-way held by a Federal, State, or local government, agency, or instrumentality or by a nonprofit association or corporation that is not controlled or owned by a profitmaking corporation or business enterprise by the value of any benefit provided to the public or to the programs of the Secretary.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3187 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3187 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3187 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3187 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.