PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 438.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 28, 1999
Craig Municipal Equity Act of 1999 - Directs the Secretary of Agriculture, subject to valid existing rights, to convey specified lands to the city of Craig, Alaska.Requires that all amounts received by the United States after enactment of this Act as proceeds of contracts, leases, permits, rights-of-way, or easements be deposited into a separate Treasury account and invested. Requires such amounts in such account to be paid by the Secretary to the city at the time of conveyance of land from which the amounts are derived.Prohibits timber harvested from land conveyed to the city from being transported as unprocessed logs from Alaska or conveyed for purposes of such transport.Provides that the land conveyed under this Act shall be considered in lieu of land not conveyed under the Alaska Statehood Act for the purpose of furthering development and expansion of the city..
People & committees
Rep. Young, Don [R-AK-At Large] · R–AK
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 438.
Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-763.
Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-763.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Committee Hearings Held.
Committee Hearings Held.
Executive Comment Requested from Agriculture.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2219-2220)
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3182 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3182 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3182 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3182 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.