Version 86 · Conference report filed in House, 2nd conference report · Nov 21, 1993
Unemployment Compensation Amendments of 1993 - Amends the Emergency Unemployment Compensation Act of 1991 to extend to February 5, 1994, the authorization for new claims for benefits under the emergency unemployment compensation (EUC) program. Reduces the number of benefit weeks available during such extended period after October 2, 1993, to seven or 13, as applicable. Modifies the final phase-out period for continuation of claims. Repeals provisions which allow certain claimants who have exhausted benefits to choose EUC benefits in lieu of regular State benefits at the beginning of a new benefit year. Amends the Social Security Act to require the State agency administering the State unemployment law to establish and use a system of worker profiling of all new claimants for regular compensation to: (1) identify which claimants will be likely to exhaust regular compensation and will need job search assistance services; (2) refer identified claimants to reemployment services available under State or Federal law; and (3) collect follow-up information on such services and employment outcomes. Directs the Secretary of Labor to report to the Congress on such profiling system. Makes a technical amendment to Unemployment Trust Fund provisions. Extends a reporting date for an advisory council on unemployment compensation. Provides for a temporary increase in the sponsorship period for aliens under the supplemental security income program. Provides for an extension of the program of emergency unemployment compensation benefits for railroad workers.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by recorded vote: 320 - 105 (Roll no. 615).(consideration: CR 11/22/93 H10908-10910)
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.
Mr. Rostenkowski brought up conference report H. Rept. 103-404 by previously agreed to special order.
PERMISSION TO CONSIDER CONFERENCE REPORT - Mr. Rostenkowski asked unanimous consent to consider the conference report on H.R. 3167, and that the conference report be considered as read when called up for consideration. Agreed to without objection.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 321 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 3167. Waiving all points of order against the conference report and against its consideration.
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference report H. Rept. 103-404 filed. (text of conference report: CR H10496-10498)
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 103-404 filed.(text of conference report: CR H10496-10498)
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 79-20. Record Vote No: 392. (consideration: CR S16653)
On motion to recommit with instructions to conference committee Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 226 - 202 (Roll no. 552). (consideration: CR H8949-8958)
Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions to conference committee was ordered without objection.
Mr. Crane moved to recommit with instructions to the conference committee.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.
Mr. Rostenkowski brought up conference report H. Rept. 103-333 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 298. (consideration: CR H8949-8958)
Rule H. Res. 298 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 298 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 3167.
Conference report H. Rept. 103-333 filed. (text of conference report: CR H8909-8911)
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 103-333 filed.(text of conference report: CR H8909-8911)
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service for consideration of Senate amendment No. 1, and modifications committed to conference: Clay, McCloskey, and Myers.
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on Ways and Means for consideration of the House bill, and Senate amendment No. 2, and modifications committed to conference: Rostenkowski, Ford (TN), and Archer.
On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 275 - 146 (Roll No. 544). (consideration: CR H8809)
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Archer motion to instruct conferees. The instructions contained in the motion require the managers on the part of the House to accede to the Senate amendment numbered 1 which directs that the number of federal employees be reduced by 252,000 by FY 1999.
Mr. Archer moved that the House instruct conferees.
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Rostenkowski moved that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate insists on its amendments asks for a conference, appoints conferees Moynihan; Baucus; Packwood.
Passed Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 76-20. Record Vote No: 342.
Motion by Senator Nickles to reconsider Vote No. 328 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S14484)
Motion to waive the Budget Act with respect to the measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 59-38. Record Vote No: 328. (consideration: CR S14319-14327)
On motion to recommit Failed by voice vote. (consideration: CR H8018)
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered without objection.
Mr. Archer moved to recommit to Ways and Means.
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3167.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 265, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Swift amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 265, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Johnson amendment.
GENERAL DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 265, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Kweisi Mfume to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 265 and Rule XXIII.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3167 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the bill, modified by the amendments recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 265. (consideration: CR H8005-8019)
Rule H. Res. 265 passed House.
Rule H. Res. 273 failed passage of House.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2437)
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 273 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3167 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, the amendments printed in part 1 of the Committee on Rules.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 265 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3167 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the bill, modified by the amendments recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 149.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 103-268.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 103-268.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3167 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3167 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3167 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3167 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.