Reprocessed Single Use Medical Device Patient Safety Act of 1999
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and Environment.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 26, 1999
Reprocessed Single Use Medical Device Patient Safety Act of 1999 - Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require every person or establishment (entity) engaged in the reprocessing of a medical device labeled for single use shall: (1) upon first engaging in such reprocessing and for each year in which such entity continues to so engage, register with the Secretary of Health and Human Services and provide all required information; and (2) for each such year, submit to the Secretary a list of devices labeled for single use that the entity is reprocessing, including names of original manufacturers and specific models. Requires each such entity to: (1) provide such information to each person or establishment that uses such device; and (2) demonstrate the device's safety and effectiveness.Requires every person or establishment that uses a class II or III reprocessed medical device, or a critical class I reprocessed medical device, for the provision of medical care to individuals to seek informed patient consent for such use, and to include a record of such use in the individual's medical record.Requires a report from the Secretary to specified congressional committees on the safety and efficacy of the reprocessing of devices labeled for single use.Requires the Secretary to modify the MEDWATCH forms to facilitate the reporting of such information.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3148 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3148 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3148 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3148 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.