PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil Service.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 26, 1999
Amends Federal employee provisions to increase from level IV to level II of the Executive Schedule the maximum pay rate for members of the Senior Executive Service (SES). Makes corresponding increases for other Federal senior-level positions, including contract appeals board members.Prohibits the pay of such senior-level positions, after locality-based comparability payments, from exceeding the annual salary of the Vice President. Prohibits cash payments to the following Federal employees in a calendar year to the extent that, when added to basic pay, such amount would exceed the annual basic pay under level I of the Executive Schedule: (1) a member of the SES; (2) a member of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Drug Enforcement Administration SES; (3) contract appeals board members; (4) certain senior-level positions; and (5) examiner-in-chief or designated examiner-in-chief in the Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce.Provides, with respect to such examiners and designated examiners: (1) an increase in the maximum pay rate to Level II of the Executive Schedule; and (2) authorized locality-based comparability payments.
People & committees
Rep. Davis, Tom [R-VA-11] · R–VA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil Service.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 4, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3147 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3147 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3147 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3147 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.