PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3120 / 104th Congress

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to witness retaliation, witness tampering and jury tampering.

Became Public Law No: 104-214.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · May 7, 1996

Revises Federal criminal code provisions regarding retaliating against or tampering with a witness, a victim, or an informant in a criminal case, or influencing or injuring an officer or juror in a criminal case through the threat or use of physical force, to provide for a maximum term of imprisonment of the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in the case.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Fox, Jon D. [R-PA-13] · R–PA

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 104-214.

    2. Became Public Law No: 104-214.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11054)

    9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S11054)

    10. Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 430.

    11. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

    12. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4788)

    13. Received in the Senate.

    14. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    15. On passage Passed by voice vote.

    16. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by voice vote.

    17. The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

    18. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

    19. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3120.

    20. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.

    21. The Speaker designated the Honorable Steven C. LaTourette to act as Chairman of the Committee.

    22. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 422 and Rule XXIII.

    23. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3120 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Providing for consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill.

    24. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 422. (consideration: CR H4494-4500)

    25. Mr. McCollum asked unanimous consent that, during the consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole, pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 422, the Chairman may postponed until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment, and that the chairman of the Committee of the Whole may reduce to not less than five minutes the time for voting by electronic device on any postponed question that immediately follows another vote by electronic device without intervening business, provided that the time for voting on the first in any series of questions shall be not less than 15 minutes. Agreed to without objection.

    26. Rule H. Res. 422 passed House.

    27. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 422 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3120 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Providing for consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill.

    28. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 266.

    29. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 104-549.

    30. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 104-549.

    31. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    32. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    33. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

    34. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    35. Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime.

    36. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    37. Introduced in House

    38. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3120 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3120 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3120 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3120 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources