Economic Security and Recovery Act of 2001 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to provide temporary (extensions for one or two years or provisions applicable only to events occurring after September 10, 2001, and before a certain date) and permanent tax relief for both individuals and businesses, including: (1) allowing additional specified depreciation for qualified property; (2) increased expensing; (3) repealing the alternative minimum tax on corporations; (4) extending the net operating loss carry back period; (5) accelerating the 25 percent individual income tax rate effective date; (6) repealing the five year holding requirement for reduced individual capital gains rates; (7) increasing the deduction for capital losses of individual taxpayers; (8) expanding the penalty free withdrawal exception for IRA distributions used for health insurance of unemployed individuals; (9) extending the period during which nonrefundable personal credits are allowed against regular and alternative minimum tax liability; (10) extending the credits for qualified electric vehicles, electricity produced from renewable resources, work opportunity, and welfare-to-work; and (11) provisions concerning the deduction for clean fuel vehicles and certain refueling property, qualified zone academy bonds, parity in the application of certain limits to mental health benefits, Archer medical savings accounts, and the subpart F (Controlled Foreign Corporations) exemption for active financing.Provides for a supplemental rebate.Provides for the transfer of specified Federal unemployment account amounts to State unemployment accounts.Amends title XX (Block Grants to States for Social Services) of the Social Security Act to increase funding for FY 2002.
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1689-1692)
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1659-1671)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate amendment.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House agree with an amendment to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 417 - 3 (Roll no. 52). (consideration: CR H744-767; text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H744-757)
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree with an amendment to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 417 - 3 (Roll no. 52).(consideration: CR H744-767; text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H744-757)
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to H.Res. 360 the House proceeded with one hour of debate on the motion to agree to the Senate amendment to H.R. 3090 with an amendment.
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 360, the House moved to agree with an amendment to the Senate amendment.
Rule H. Res. 360 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 360 Reported to House. It shall be in order to take from the Speaker's table the bill H.R. 3090 with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House a motion to agree to the Senate amendment, with a further amendment. The motion shall be debatable for one hour, equally divided and controlled.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.
Considered by Senate. By Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S841-842)
The committee substitute and title amendment were withdrawn by Unanimous Consent.
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S11744-11783)
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S11678-11708; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S11678-11696)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 223.
Committee on Finance. Reported by Senator Baucus with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. Without written report.
Committee on Finance. Reported by Senator Baucus with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. Without written report.
Committee on Finance. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 214 (Roll no. 404). (text: CR H7242-7247)
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion require that the bill be reported back to the House with amendments that: 1) reduce the tax cut provisions of the bill in an amount equal to the expense of financing short and long-term efforts to combat terrorism; 2) provide that the legislation is temporary and is fully offset in the Internal Revenue Code over the next ten years, such that the long-term deficit and national debt are not increased; and 3) provide assistance to workers who lost their jobs and health insurance coverage, and to businesses affected by the economic circumstances following the occurrences of September 11, 2001.
Mr. Turner moved to recommit with instructions to Ways and Means.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 270, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Rangel amendment in the nature of a substitute.
Rule H. Res. 270 passed House.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3090.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3090 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. All points of order against the bill, as amended, are waived. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 270. (consideration: CR H7236-7283; text as reported in House: CR H7236-7242)
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 270 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3090 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. All points of order against the bill, as amended, are waived. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 153.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 107-251.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 107-251.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 14.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Feb 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3090 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3090 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3090 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3090 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.