PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3089 / 103rd Congress

Family Medicine and Primary Care Research Act of 1993

Referred to the Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education and Training.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 15, 1993

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Office of Family Medicine and Primary Care Research Title II: Incentives for Rural Physicians Regarding Primary Care Title III: Primary Care Physicians Under Approved Medical Residency Training Programs Family Medicine and Primary Care Research Act of 1993 - Title I: Office of Family Medicine and Primary Care Research - Amends the Public Health Service Act to establish in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) the Office on Family Medicine and Primary Care Research to monitor and coordinate all NIH research, training, and information dissemination activities regarding family medicine and other primary medical care disciplines. Provides for the development, modernization, and operation of new and existing research centers in family care and primary care. Mandates an advisory council. Title II: Incentives for Rural Physicians Regarding Primary Care - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow a deduction for medical education loan interest that accrues while a physician is providing primary care or obstetrical and gynecological services in a medically underserved rural area and living in that area. Amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 with regard to the Stafford Federal Student Loan Program to defer principal payments and with regard to the Perkins Direct Student Loan Program to defer principal and interest payments while the borrower is serving in an internship or residency program in preparation for practice in primary care or obstetrics and gynecology. Amends titles XVIII (Medicare) and XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act to modify requirements regarding substitute billing arrangements. Title III: Primary Care Physicians Under Approved Medical Residency Training Programs - Mandates a national policy that at least 50 percent of entry positions in medical residency training programs be in primary care. Allows waiver for a State if application of the general rule would not be practicable. Amends Medicare provisions to tie to that policy Medicare payments to hospitals for direct graduate medical education costs and for indirect costs of medical education. Establishes the National Health Professional Workforce Advisory Board to make recommendations on: (1) the distribution of such positions among primary and non-primary care residents at various sites; (2) the supply and role of non-physician primary care providers; and (3) the appropriateness of spending Medicare direct graduate medical education funds available for the clinical training of physicians and nurses for the clinical training in primary care of additional practitioners. Repeals provisions of the Health Professions Education Extension Amendments of 1992 establishing the Council on Graduate Medical Education. Mandates annual publication of a list of the total amount of payments made to each hospital in the United States during the previous year under Medicare provisions relating to direct graduate medical education costs.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Klug, Scott L. [R-WI-2] · R–WI

Committees

  • Education and Workforce Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
  • Ways and Means Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education and Training.

    2. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment.

    3. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

    4. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

    5. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

    6. Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.

    7. Introduced in House

    8. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jun 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3089 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3089 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3089 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3089 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources