PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3085 / 109th Congress

To amend the National Trails System Act to update the feasibility and suitability study originally prepared for the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail and provide for the inclusion of new trail segments, land components, and campgrounds associated with that trail, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 109-378.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Sep 29, 2006

Amends the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to complete the remaining criteria and submit to Congress a study regarding the feasibility and suitability of designating as additional components of the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail the following routes and land components by which the Cherokee Nation was removed to Oklahoma: (1) the Benge and Belle routes; (2) the land components of the designated water routes in Alabama, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Tennessee; (3) the routes from the collection forts in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee to the emigration depots; and (4) related campgrounds located along such routes and in such land components. Prohibits any additional funds from being authorized to be appropriated to carry out such amendment. Permits the Secretary to accept donations for the Trail from private, nonprofit, or tribal organizations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Wamp, Zach [R-TN-3] · R–TN

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
20 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 109-378.

  2. Became Public Law No: 109-378.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 383 - 3 (Roll no. 517). (text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H8583)

    House roll call 517 · Individual votes
  9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 383 - 3 (Roll no. 517).(text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H8583)

    House roll call 517 · Individual votes
  10. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 5, rule I, the chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the motion to suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment to H.R. 3085.

  12. Mr. Radanovich moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H8583-8584, H8604-8605)

  13. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  14. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  15. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  16. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S10539)

  17. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  18. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  19. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  20. Received in the Senate.

  21. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  22. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 356 - 5 (Roll no. 375). (text: CR H5232-5233)

    House roll call 375 · Individual votes
  23. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 356 - 5 (Roll no. 375).(text: CR H5232-5233)

    House roll call 375 · Individual votes
  24. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5245-5246)

  25. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  26. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3085.

  27. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5232-5234)

  28. Mr. Renzi moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  29. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 309.

  30. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 109-549.

  31. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 109-549.

  32. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

  33. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  34. Subcommittee on National Parks Discharged.

  35. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  36. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks.

  37. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  38. Introduced in House

  39. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3085 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3085 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3085 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3085 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources