PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 203.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 11, 2001
Interim Budget Control and Enforcement Act of 2001-Amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to increase discretionary spending limits for FY 2002.Requires the President's FY 2003 budget submission to identify emergency-designated funding that was enacted in response to the events of September 11, 2001, and that is ongoing and recurring in nature.Adjusts figures within the concurrent resolution on the budget for FY 2002 with regard to: (1) total new budget authority; (2) total budget outlays; (3) the surplus; (4) the public debt; (5) net interest; (6) and allowances. Requires the chairmen of the budget committees of each House to: (1) make the necessary conforming changes for FY 2003-2011 in each of such areas; and (2) make appropriate adjustments in the allocations to their respective Committees on Appropriations.
People & committees
Rep. Nussle, Jim [R-IA-2] · R–IA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 203.
Reported by the Committee on The Budget. H. Rept. 107-338.
Reported by the Committee on The Budget. H. Rept. 107-338.
Referred to the House Committee on the Budget.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3084 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3084 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3084 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3084 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.