PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 106-407.
Congressional Research Service
Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Oct 11, 2000
Southeast Federal Center Public-Private Development Act of 2000 - Authorizes the Administrator of General Services (GSA) to enter into agreements with private entities for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, operation, maintenance, or use of the Southeast Federal Center (a site in the southwest quadrant of Washington, DC, under GSA control) or other appropriate activities related to the Center. Requires any such agreement to ensure that redevelopment of the Center is consistent with the objectives of the National Capital Planning Commission's vision plan entitled "Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capital in the 21st Century."Requires the Administrator, before entering into a final agreement, to report to specified congressional committees. Requires a 30-day waiting period after such submission before the agreement may become effective.Requires any net proceeds (after expenses) under an agreement to be deposited into the Federal Buildings Fund established under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949.
People & committees
Rep. Franks, Bob [R-NJ-7] · R–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 106-407.
Became Public Law No: 106-407.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H9999-10000)
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by voice vote.(consideration: CR H9999-10000)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the motion.
Mr. Shuster moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10271-10272; text as passed Senate: CR S10271-10272)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10271-10272; text as passed Senate: CR S10271-10272)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 905.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Thompson with amendments. With written report No. 106-458.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Thompson with amendments. With written report No. 106-458.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2628-2629)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H2628-2629)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3069.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2628-2630)
Mr. LaTourette moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 321.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 106-591.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 106-591.
Mr. LaTourette asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Transportation have until midnight on April 6 to file a report on H.R. 3069. Agreed to without objection.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, Hazardous Materials and Pipeline Transportation.
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3069 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3069 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3069 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3069 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.