To resolve certain conveyances under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act related to Cape Fox Corporation, and for other purposes.

Committee Hearings Held.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 12, 1996

Provides for the conveyance of lands located near Ketchikan, Alaska, to the Cape Fox Corporation (Cape Fox). Makes certain lands eligible for selection by Cape Fox for a 24-month period. Provides for the direct conveyance of a certain parcel of land. Waives the core township requirement for certain non-productive lands. Allows Cape Fox to be credited for reconveyance of a certain parcel of land that includes the Beaver Falls Hydroelectric power-house site. Makes available certain parcels of land to Cape Fox for its homesite program.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Young, Don [R-AK-At Large] · R–AK

Committees

Natural Resources Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jul 23, 1996
Committee Hearings Held.
Mar 12, 1996
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Mar 12, 1996
Introduced in House
Mar 12, 1996
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Mar 12, 1996 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3061 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3061, 104th Congress: To resolve certain conveyances under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act related to Cape Fox Corporation, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3061

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-03-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3061/BILLS-104hr3061ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:11Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.3061 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3061 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3061, 104th Congress: To resolve certain conveyances under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act related to Cape Fox Corporation, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3061

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-03-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3061/BILLS-104hr3061ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:11Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3061 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3061 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3061, 104th Congress: To resolve certain conveyances under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act related to Cape Fox Corporation, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3061

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-03-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3061/BILLS-104hr3061ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:11Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3061 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3061 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3061, 104th Congress: To resolve certain conveyances under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act related to Cape Fox Corporation, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3061

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1996-03-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr3061/BILLS-104hr3061ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:11Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3061 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.