PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3056 / 110th Congress

Tax Collection Responsibility Act of 2007

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Oct 10, 2007

Tax Collection Responsibility Act of 2007 - (Sec. 2) Repeals the authority of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to enter into private debt collection contracts. Exempts contracts entered into before July 18, 2007, if such contracts are not renewed or extended after such date. Nullifies any contract entered into, extended, or renewed on or after July 18, 2007.

(Sec. 3) Delays until 2012 the requirement for federal, state, and local agencies to withhold 3% of payments for goods and services provided to such agencies.

Requires the Secretary of the Treasury to report to the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee on Finance on issues relating to the administration of the withholding requirement.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

(Sec. 4) Treats income tax returns filed with the U.S. Virgin Islands by an individual claiming to be a bona fide resident of the Virgin Islands during the entire taxable year as filed with the United States for tax administration purposes.

(Sec. 5) Sets forth additional rules for the tax treatment of high-income individuals who relinquish U.S. citizenship or residency to avoid U.S. taxation (expatriates). Treats all property of expatriates as sold for its fair market value on the day before the expatriation date and includes gain (over $600,000) or loss from such sale in the gross income of such expatriates. Allows expatriates to elect to defer payment of any tax resulting from expatriation if adequate security for payment of such tax is given.

Requires 30% withholding of tax for certain items of deferred compensation payable to expatriates.

Imposes a separate tax on gifts and bequests from expatriates exceeding $10,000, payable by the recipient of such gift or bequest.

(Sec. 6) Repeals provisions providing for a 36-month suspension of interest and penalties on tax underpayments for taxpayers who had not been notified of a tax deficiency by the IRS.

(Sec. 7) Increases penalties for failing to file correct information returns, failing to furnish correct payee statements, and failing to comply with other information reporting requirements.

(Sec. 8) Increases to 115.25% the rate for estimated tax payments for certain large corporations in the third quarter of 2012.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-15] · D–NY

Committees

  • Finance Committee
  • Ways and Means Committee
9 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

  2. On passage Passed by recorded vote: 232 - 173 (Roll no. 960). (text: CR H11449-11452)

    House roll call 960 · Individual votes
  3. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 232 - 173 (Roll no. 960).(text: CR H11449-11452)

    House roll call 960 · Individual votes
  5. On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 196 - 212 (Roll no. 959).

    House roll call 959 · Individual votes
  6. The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H11463)

  7. DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hulshof motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment adding a new section making the estate tax repeal permanent.

  8. Mr. Hulshof moved to recommit with instructions to Ways and Means. (consideration: CR H11462-11464)

  9. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H11462)

  10. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3056.

  11. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3056 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 or rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted

  12. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 719. (consideration: CR H11400-11410, H11446-11464; text: CR H11400)

  13. Rule H. Res. 719 passed House.

  14. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 719 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3056 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 or rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted

  15. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 182.

  16. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 110-281.

  17. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 110-281.

  18. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 18.

  19. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  20. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

  21. Introduced in House

  22. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3056 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3056 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3056 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3056 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources