PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3056 / 104th Congress

To permit a county-operated health insuring organization to qualify as an organization exempt from certain requirements otherwise applicable to health insuring organizations under the Medicaid program notwithstanding that the organization enrolls Medicaid beneficiaries residing in another county.

Became Public Law No: 104-240.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 7, 1996

Amends the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 to permit certain county-operated health insuring organizations in California to qualify as organizations exempt from certain otherwise applicable Medicaid requirements, even though they enroll Medicaid beneficiaries residing in another county.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Riggs, Frank [R-CA-1] · R–CA

Committees

  • Finance Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 104-240.

    2. Became Public Law No: 104-240.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

    9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

    10. Senate Committee on Finance discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11329)

    11. Senate Committee on Finance discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S11329)

    12. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

    13. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    14. On passage Passed by voice vote.

    15. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by voice vote.

    16. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rules of the House.

    17. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    18. Considered from the Corrections Calendar. (consideration: CR H10115-10118)

    19. Called up from the Corrections Calendar for consideration.

    20. Placed on the Corrections Calendar, Calendar No. 20.

    21. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 397.

    22. Reported by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 104-751.

    23. Reported by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 104-751.

    24. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

    25. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    26. Subcommittee on Health and Environment Discharged.

    27. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and Environment.

    28. Referred to the House Committee on Commerce.

    29. Introduced in House

    30. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jun 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3056 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3056 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3056 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3056 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources