Parks and Refuges Small Business Fairness Act of 1996
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 7, 1996
Parks and Refuges Small Business Fairness Act of 1996 - Amends the Small Business Act to authorize the provision of disaster assistance loans under such Act to assist any small business that: (1) has a concessions contract or incidental business license to operate within a unit of the National Park System or Wildlife Refuge System; and (2) has suffered substantial economic injury as a result of a partial Federal Government shutdown during the period beginning December 15, 1995, and ending January 5, 1996. Prohibits such loans if the applicant can obtain credit elsewhere. Limits each loan to $100,000. Authorizes the Small Business Administration to permit deferral of principal and interest payments on such loans for a one-year period. Prohibits the loan interest rate from exceeding four percent.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3044 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3044 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3044 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3044 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.