PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3035 / 106th Congress

Utah National Parks and Public Lands Wilderness Act

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 7, 1999

Utah National Parks and Public Lands Wilderness Act - Title I: Wilderness Areas in Utah National Park System Lands - Designates specified lands within the following areas of Utah as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) Arches National Park; (2) Bryce Canyon National Park; (3) Canyonlands National Park; (4) Capitol Reef National Park; (5) Cedar Breaks National Monument; (6) Dinosaur National Monument; (7) Glen Canyon National Recreation Area; and (8) Zion National Park. Requires the Secretary of the Interior to administer and manage such lands. Authorizes on such designated lands the continuation of current livestock grazing, valid existing water rights, and overflights.Authorizes appropriations.Title II: Public Land Wilderness - Designates specified public lands in Utah as components of the System. Requires the Secretary to administer such lands.Prohibits the restriction or preclusion of low-level overflights and low-level military overflights over designated System lands, as well as the removal of existing communications and tracking systems. Prohibits restricting or precluding the timely access to any area to respond to emergency situations. Authorizes the control or restriction of public access to designated areas when required by national security or public safety. Authorizes on such designated lands the continuation of current livestock grazing and valid existing water rights.(Sec. 203) Provides for the release from wilderness designation, as well as study for possible designation, of certain lands in specified Utah counties.(Sec. 205) Withdraws lands designated under this title from all forms of entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws, mining laws, and mineral and geothermal leasing.(Sec. 206) Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hansen, James V. [R-UT-1] · R–UT

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    2. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.

    3. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    4. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H9519)

    5. Introduced in House

    6. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3035 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3035 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3035 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3035 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources