To amend title 10, United States Code, to restore the eligibility of former members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retired or retainer pay or equivalent pay, or a dependent of such members, and who are eligible for hospital insurance benefits under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) for prescription pharmaceuticals through the military medical system.

Executive Comment Requested from DOD.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 8, 1993

Directs the Secretary of Defense to establish a program to provide prescription pharmaceuticals to members and former members of the armed forces (and dependents of such members) who are entitled to certain retired or retainer pay and Medicare benefits and who would be eligible for armed forces health benefits but for their Medicare eligibility. Requires the Secretary to: (1) determine the pharmaceuticals that may be obtained by eligible persons; and (2) establish a fee or copayment to be paid for such pharmaceuticals. Bars such fees or copayments from exceeding those established under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 for participation in the pharmaceutical demonstration project or the retail pharmacy network included in a managed health care program.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Hall, Ralph M. [D-TX-4] · D–TX

Committees

Armed Services Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Sep 13, 1993
Executive Comment Requested from DOD.
Sep 13, 1993
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Forces and Personnel.
Sep 9, 1993
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2120)
Sep 8, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Sep 8, 1993
Introduced in House
Sep 8, 1993
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Sep 8, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jun 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3022 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3022, 103rd Congress: To amend title 10, United States Code, to restore the eligibility of former members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retired or retainer pay or equivalent pay, or a dependent of such members, and who are eligible for hospital insurance benefits under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) for prescription pharmaceuticals through the military medical system.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/3022

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-09-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr3022/BILLS-103hr3022ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.3022 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3022 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3022, 103rd Congress: To amend title 10, United States Code, to restore the eligibility of former members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retired or retainer pay or equivalent pay, or a dependent of such members, and who are eligible for hospital insurance benefits under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) for prescription pharmaceuticals through the military medical system.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/3022

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-09-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr3022/BILLS-103hr3022ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3022 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3022 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3022, 103rd Congress: To amend title 10, United States Code, to restore the eligibility of former members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retired or retainer pay or equivalent pay, or a dependent of such members, and who are eligible for hospital insurance benefits under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) for prescription pharmaceuticals through the military medical system.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/3022

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-09-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr3022/BILLS-103hr3022ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3022 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3022 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3022, 103rd Congress: To amend title 10, United States Code, to restore the eligibility of former members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retired or retainer pay or equivalent pay, or a dependent of such members, and who are eligible for hospital insurance benefits under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) for prescription pharmaceuticals through the military medical system.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/3022

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-09-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr3022/BILLS-103hr3022ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3022 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.