Impaired Driving Repeat Offender Prevention Act

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 23, 2019

Impaired Driving Repeat Offender Prevention Act

This bill directs the Department of Transportation to withhold specified graduated percentages of a state's apportionment of certain federal-aid highway funds for FY2022-FY2024 (5% in each fiscal year thereafter), if the state has not enacted and is not enforcing certain laws to prevent repeat intoxicated driving.

Specifically, a state must require the installation of an ignition interlock device for a minimum of 180 days on each motor vehicle operated by an individual convicted of driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Lowey, Nita M. [D-NY-17] · D–NY

Committees

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Rep. Finkenauer, Abby [D-IA-1]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

May 24, 2019
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
May 23, 2019
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
May 23, 2019
Introduced in House
May 23, 2019
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · May 23, 2019 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 3011 · End Drunk Driving Act of 2019

Source last updated: Jan 3, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2998 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2998, 116th Congress: Impaired Driving Repeat Offender Prevention Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2998

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2019-05-23.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr2998/BILLS-116hr2998ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-03T03:02:07Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.2998 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2998 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2998, 116th Congress: Impaired Driving Repeat Offender Prevention Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2998

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2019-05-23.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr2998/BILLS-116hr2998ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-03T03:02:07Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.2998 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2998 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2998, 116th Congress: Impaired Driving Repeat Offender Prevention Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2998

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2019-05-23.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr2998/BILLS-116hr2998ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-03T03:02:07Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.2998 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2998 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2998, 116th Congress: Impaired Driving Repeat Offender Prevention Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2998

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2019-05-23.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr2998/BILLS-116hr2998ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-03T03:02:07Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.2998 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.