PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2977 / 104th Congress

Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1995

For Further Action See H.R.4194.

Official summary

Version 48 · Conference report filed in House · Sep 25, 1996

Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 - Amends the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA) and other Federal law with regard to alternative means of dispute resolution (ADR) in the administrative process. (Sec. 2) Includes the use of ombuds and arbitration among ADR procedures, but excludes settlement negotiations. Repeals: (1) the current exclusion and permits parties to use ADR to resolve certain Federal employee-related disputes involving such matters as retirement, life or health insurance, and suspension or removal from duty, as well as prohibited personnel practices; and (2) a requirement that a procedure used be in lieu of an adjudication to come within the definition of ADR. (Sec. 3) Limits applicability of confidentiality requirements only to communications involved in the proceeding, and no longer, also, to any information concerning such communications. Provides that a dispute resolution communication generated by a neutral which may not be disclosed under such provisions is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. (Sec. 4) Makes certain amendments under ADRA and the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 to reflect the closure of the Administrative Conference of the United States. (Sec. 5) Authorizes a Federal agency to use the services and facilities of State, local, and tribal governments for ADR purposes. (Sec. 6) Amends the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 to: (1) require contractors using ADR procedures to resolve a claim against the Federal Government to comply with the same certification procedures applicable to any other claim subject to such Act; and (2) repeal its termination date. (Sec. 7) Provides for expedited hiring of neutrals in civilian and defense agency contracts for use in any part of an ADR process. Amends ADR law on neutrals to: (1) repeal requirements for the Government to establish professional standards for neutrals and maintain a roster of qualified neutrals; and (2) require the President to designate an agency or designate or establish an interagency committee to facilitate and encourage agency use of dispute resolution. Directs such agency or committee to encourage and facilitate agency use of ADR and develop procedures that permit agencies to obtain the services of neutrals on an expedited basis. (Sec. 8) Revises ADRA and other ADR law, with regard to judicial review of arbitration awards, to: (1) repeal the authority of Federal agency heads to vacate unilaterally any award issued pursuant to an arbitration proceeding; (2) require each arbitration agreement to specify a maximum award that may be issued by the arbitrator and allow it to specify other conditions limiting the range of possible outcomes; (3) prohibit an agency officer or employee from offering to use arbitration for the resolution of issues in controversy unless he or she has authority to enter into a settlement concerning the matter or is otherwise specifically authorized by the agency to consent to the use of arbitration; and (4) require the head of an agency, prior to using binding arbitration, to issue guidance on its appropriate use or when an agency officer or employee has authority to settle an issue in controversy through binding arbitration. (Sec. 9) Amends ADRA to repeal its termination date and provide for permanent authorization. (Sec. 10) Authorizes appropriations. (Sec. 11) Repeals the reauthorization for the Administrative Conference under the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990. Directs the President to designate an agency or designate or establish an interagency committee to facilitate and encourage agency use of negotiated rulemaking. Modifies Federal provisions regarding defense agency contracts and Federal contracts to provide for expedited hiring of conveners and facilitators for negotiated rulemaking. Authorizes appropriations. Requires the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to: (1) take action to expedite the establishment of negotiated rulemaking committees and committees established to resolve disputes under ADRA; and (2) submit recommendations to the Congress for any necessary legislative changes. (Sec. 12) Revises Federal judicial code provisions regarding the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Grants such court jurisdiction to review the agency's decision pursuant to specified standards.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Gekas, George W. [R-PA-17] · R–PA

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. For Further Action See H.R.4194.

  2. Conference papers: Senate report and managers' statement held at the desk in Senate.

  3. Conference report H. Rept. 104-841 filed. (text of conference report: CR H11108-11111)

  4. Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 104-841 filed.(text of conference report: CR H11108-11111)

  5. Conferees agreed to file conference report.

  6. Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. The Speaker appointed conferees: Hyde, Gekas, Flanagan, Conyers, and Reed.

  9. On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H10607)

  10. Mr. Hyde asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference.

  11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  12. Senate appointed conferees Stevens; Cohen; Grassley; Glenn; Levin by unanimous consent.

  13. Senate insisted on its amendment, requested a conference. (consideration: CR S6162)

  14. Passed Senate in lieu of S. 1224 with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent.

  15. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate in lieu of S. 1224 with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent.

  16. Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 1224 amended.

  17. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S6162)

  18. Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 427.

  19. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  20. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  21. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  22. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  23. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5786-5789)

  24. Mr. Gekas moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  25. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 297.

  26. Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 104-597.

  27. Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 104-597.

  28. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  29. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  30. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

  31. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  32. Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.

  33. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  34. Introduced in House

  35. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2977 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2977 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2977 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2977 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources