PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2972 / 105th Congress

ESRD Continuous Quality Improvement Program Act of 1997

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 8, 1997

ESRD Continuous Quality Improvement Program Act of 1997 - Amends title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a specified quality improvement (CQI) program under Medicare for providers of services and end stage renal disease (ESRD) dialysis facilities under which outstanding providers and facilities will be rewarded and providers and facilities in need of additional training will receive such training through network administrative organizations (NAOs). Requires the Secretary to: (1) publish in the Federal Register specified ESRD Core Indicators; (2) establish a standard information management system to promote the electronic transfer of data obtained under the CQI Program among providers, facilities, the Secretary, and NAOs; and (3) identify those dialysis facilities and physicians that are two standard deviations above the national norm for a preponderance of ESRD Core Indicators on a case severity adjusted basis for two consecutive reporting periods, and designate them as Medicare Dialysis Providers of Achievement. Requires the Secretary or the appropriate NAO to: (1) notify any facility or physician two deviations below the national norm for a preponderance of ESRD Core Indicators on a case severity adjusted basis for two consecutive reporting periods; and (2) develop strategies to improve services and provide appropriate training in CQI Program processes. Requires providers and facilities to participate in a CQI program in order to receive payment under Medicare. Directs the Secretary to: (1) analyze the financial impact of the establishment of such quality improvement program on ESRD NAOs; and (2) submit to the Congress recommendations appropriate to assist the organizations meeting their responsibilities under such program.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13] · D–CA

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

    2. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and Environment.

    3. Referred to House Ways and Means

    4. Referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    5. Referred to House Commerce

    6. Introduced in House

    7. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jun 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.2972 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.2972 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.2972 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.2972 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources