Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Apr 23, 2002
Deep Creek-Yampatika Ute Wilderness Act - Establishes the Deep Creek Ute Wilderness Area in Colorado. Directs the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to manage such lands in accordance with the Wilderness Act and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.Sets forth administrative provisions regarding: (1) withdrawal of such lands from further entry or appropriation under public land, mining, or mineral leasing laws; and (2) use of such lands for navigation training exercises by the Colorado Army National Guard, hunting and fishing, and livestock grazing.Prohibits the development of any new water resource facility. Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to consult with the Colorado Water Conservation Board regarding instream flow protection recommendations. Authorizes the Secretary to make grants to the Colorado Department of Natural Resources for compensating willing parties for any water rights within or upstream of the Wilderness Area.Authorizes the evaluation of adjacent areas for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2963 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2963 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2963 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2963 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.