Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 24, 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Bureau of Land Management Title II: Forest Service Title III: Equitable Exchange Oregon Land Exchange Act of 1999 - Title I: Bureau of Land Management - Northeast Oregon Assembled Land Exchange Act of 1999 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), to convey to certain identified private landowners all U.S. rights and interests in specified lands within the Central Oregon and Baker Resource areas in Oregon in exchange for the conveyance by such landowners of certain other parcels of land within such resource areas. Title II: Forest Service - Triangle Land Exchange Act of 1999 - Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to certain identified private landowners all U.S. rights and interests in specified lands within the Malheur National Forest, Oregon, in exchange for the conveyance by such landowners of certain other parcels of land within or adjacent to the Malheur, Wallowa-Whitman, and Umatilla National Forests in Oregon. Title III: Equitable Exchange - Provides for exchange valuation, appraisals, and equalization of value received with respect to such land exchanges. Provides for administration and management, by the BLM or Forest Service, as appropriate, of lands received by the United States.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2950 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2950 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2950 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2950 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.