PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 23, 1999
Alliance for Technologically Trained Teachers Act - Amends title IV (Student Assistance) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include, among community service activities for which Federal work-study program funds may be used: (1) technology training; and (2) tutoring teachers in the uses of classroom technology. Requires institutions of higher education to use the following portions of their Federal work-study program grants as follows: (1) at least ten (currently seven) percent to compensate students employed in community service; and (2) at least three percent to compensate students employed in technology training or tutoring teachers in the uses of classroom technology (or both). Directs the Secretary of Education to: (1) study specified and other means of improving the efficiency of the technological training of teachers; and (2) report to Congress the results, including proposals for a comprehensive approach to providing technologically competent teachers to schools and a plan for accomplishing specified objectives determined to be feasible and effective.
People & committees
Rep. Larson, John B. [D-CT-1] · D–CT
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2933 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2933 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2933 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2933 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.