PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2920 / 105th Congress

Border Improvement and Immigration Act of 1998

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 7, 1997

Amends the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 with respect to specified land border provisions of the automated entry-exit control system.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Solomon, Gerald B. H. [R-NY-22] · R–NY

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
18 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  2. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  3. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  4. Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 1360 amended.

  5. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S9510)

  6. Referred to Subcommittee on Immigration.

  7. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

  8. Received in the Senate.

  9. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  10. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 325 - 90 (Roll no. 627). (consideration: CR H10571-10574)

    House roll call 627 · Individual votes
  11. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 325 - 90 (Roll no. 627).(consideration: CR H10571-10574)

    House roll call 627 · Individual votes
  12. DEBATE - The House resumed debate.

  13. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  14. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9932-9937)

  15. Mr. Smith (TX) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  16. Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims.

  17. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  18. Introduced in House

  19. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2920 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2920 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2920 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2920 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources