PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2917 / 103rd Congress

To reform the Federal Reserve System.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Growth and Credit Formation.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Aug 6, 1993

Amends the Federal Reserve Act to provide that the President shall appoint the five Federal Reserve Bank representatives who sit on the Federal Open Market Committee after consultation with, and consideration of, candidates selected by the Federal Advisory Council. (Currently such representatives are elected by the boards of directors of selected Federal Reserve Banks.) Requires the Federal Open Market Committee to meet and consult, on a quarterly basis, with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. Provides that the terms of office of the Chairman and Vice-chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) shall coincide with the term of office of the President. Amends Federal finance law to require the Board to submit annually to the President, for subsequent submission to the Congress, its estimated receipts and proposed expenditures for the current year, and for the next two succeeding years (including those of the Federal Reserve Banks).

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Blackwell, Lucien E. [D-PA-2] · D–PA

Committees

  • Financial Services Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Growth and Credit Formation.

    2. Referred to the House Committee on Banking, Finance + Urban Affrs.

    3. Introduced in House

    4. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Feb 6, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.2917 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.2917 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.2917 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.2917 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources