Integrity in Banking and Money Laundering Prevention Act of 1999
Referred to the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 21, 1999
Integrity in Banking and Money Laundering Prevention Act of 1999 - Instructs the Secretary of the Treasury to report to certain congressional committees on private domestic banking activities, including regulatory efforts to monitor and ensure that such activities are conducted in compliance with Federal banking law governing monetary transactions and depository institution recordkeeping requirements.Instructs the Secretary to: (1) prescribe regulations which require financial institutions to maintain all accounts in such a way as to ensure that the name of the account holder and the number of the account are associated with all of the owner's account activity; and (2) develop criteria for identifying foreign high-intensity money laundering areas.Authorizes courts to double criminal penalties for violations involving high-intensity money laundering areas.Directs the Secretary to: (1) require domestic financial institutions to maintain records within the United States which accurately identify the parties for whom such institutions conduct transactions with foreign counterparts; and (2) promulgate final regulations requiring registered brokers and dealers to report suspicious transactions in accordance with specified banking law.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2905 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2905 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2905 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2905 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.